On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 12:06 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Nathan Boley <npbo...@gmail.com> writes: > > Also, I am a little skeptical about this patch. I am sorry if this has > > already been discussed, but would this mean that I need to choose > > whether pl/python is built against Python 2.* or Python 3.*? > > Yes. That's exactly what I was complaining about upthread. I'm not > a Python user, but from what I can gather of the 2-to-3 changes, > having to choose one at package build time is going to be a disaster. >
Agreed. We really need to have a plpython and plpython3. Heck this would play nicely too because we support backward compatibility but also upward version differences. Joshua D. Drake > regards, tom lane > -- PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564 Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering If the world pushes look it in the eye and GRR. Then push back harder. - Salamander -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers