Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> writes:
> On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 09:23 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>> If SRFs use a tuplestore in that situation, it sounds like that should
>>> be fixed. Why do we need to provide alternate syntax involving COPY?
>>
>> It isn't problem of SRF function design. It allow both mode - row and
>> tuplestor.
> select * from generate_series(1,1000000000) limit 1;
> That statement takes a long time, which indicates to me that it's
> materializing the result of the SRF.
Yeah. This is certainly fixable if someone wants to do the legwork of
refactoring ExecMakeTableFunctionResult(). It was done that way
originally just to keep down the complexity of introducing the
function-as-table-source feature at all.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
