>>>>> "Hitoshi" == Hitoshi Harada <umi.tan...@gmail.com> writes:
Hitoshi> One thing for rule test, I checked existing regression test Hitoshi> cases and concluded DROP VIEW is necessary, or even VIEW Hitoshi> test for a specific feature is not needed. I remember your Hitoshi> aggregate ORDER BY patch contains "rules" test Hitoshi> changes. However, since processing order of regression tests Hitoshi> is not predictable and may change AFAIK, I guess it Hitoshi> shouldn't add those changes in rules.out. Actually, looking more closely, the way you have it currently works only by chance - "rules" and "window" are running in parallel, therefore the view creation in "window" can break the output of "rules". The order of regression tests is set in parallel_schedule and serial_schedule; it's unpredictable only for tests within the same parallel group. I think a modification of the schedule is needed here; the only other option would be to move the view creation into a different test. -- Andrew. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
