Stephen Frost wrote: > * Bruce Momjian (br...@momjian.us) wrote: > > I am not replying to many of these emails so I don't appear to be > > brow-beating (forcing) the community into accepting this features. I > > might be brow-beating the community, but I don't want to _appear_ to be > > brow-beating. ;-) > > My apologies if I come across this way- I don't intend to... But I'm
You are fine. I was just saying that at a time I was one of the few loud voices on this, and if this is going to happen, it will be because we have a team that wants to do this, not because I am being loud. I see the team forming nicely. > also very enthusiastic about this. Also, it's become a much more > personal issue for me due to this: > > http://csrc.nist.gov/news_events/documents/omb/draft-omb-fy2010-security-metrics.pdf > > OMB is now looking to include label-based security in their metrics. > This directly impacts some of the PG-based systems I run. Ah, very interesting, and good. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
