Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> I also have to say that I'm very skeptical of the argument
> that there is only a small list of types people will want this for.

I'm not sure that anyone has argued that.  I did suggest that there
might be a small list of types for which we should provide discrete
behavior (ie, with next/previous functions) and the rest could have
continuous behavior (without that assumption).  But I quite agree
that we want both types of ranges.

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to