On 15.12.09 15:52 , Tom Lane wrote:
to...@tuxteam.de writes:(and as Andrew Dunstan pointed out off-list: I was wrong with my bold assertion that one can squeeze infinitely many (arbitrary length) strings between two given. This is not always the case).Really? If the string length is unbounded I think you were right.
One example is "a" and "aa" (assuming "a" is minimal character in your alphabet). The general case is the strings A and Aaaaaaa...a I think - it doesn't get any more exciting than this. This *is* a bit surprising, since one usually assumes that the ordering of strings and reals is fairly similar, since both are lexical. But note that the mapping of strings into the reals this intuition is based on (simply prefix a the string with "0." and interpret as a real, or something similar if the alphabet isn't {0,1}) isn't one-to-one - the strings "1", "10", "100", ... are all mapped to the *same* real number 0.1 So for reals, the statement is reduced to the trivial fact that for every x there is no y with x < y < x. Which is of course true.. best regards, Florian Pflug
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature