On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Daniel Farina <drfar...@acm.org> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Sure. If you think you can make it work using bytea, that seems >> clearly better than using an internal type, all things being equal. > > I think both are perfectly viable and can be supported simultaneously, > actually...I simply like INTERNAL because the mechanism and passed > data structure for when you *do* want to write a C function is just > really crisp and simple, and is not going to be a source of overhead.
OK. I think we'll have to see the proposed patch before we can really make a final judgement on this, but hopefully I've at least given you enough feedback/food for thought to move this forward in a meaningful way... ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
