On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <ste...@kaltenbrunner.cc> wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Alvaro Herrera >> <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: >>> >>> Robert Haas escribió: >>>> >>>> Over the past few months, I've been attempting to keep tracks of which >>>> postings on pgsql-bugs have not gotten a response and to respond to >>>> those where I have a clue what the issue might be. >>> >>> So you installed the bugzilla module on yourself? Neat. Keep at it! >> >> Actually it's Brucezilla. > > hmm maybe I should resurrect the bugzilla testbed again :)
If we're going to use a bug-tracker, Bugzilla wouldn't be my first choice, I don't think. Honestly what I'd like better than a full-fledged trackers is just a webapp that lists all the unreplied-to emails in the pgsql-bugs archives. That wouldn't of course tell you if a bug got a reply that didn't actually resolve the issue, but that doesn't seem to be very common anyway. Most times if nobody responds it's because either (1) it's not really a bug (user question, feature request, etc.) or (2) the person who is qualified to respond doesn't actually read pgsql-bugs. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
