On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > Oh, wow, I didn't realize it was time for another round of this. Wheeeee! >
Actually I suspect it is time. My preferences have changed. While they used to go something like debbugs > RT > nothing > bugzilla they now go something like debbugs > RT > bugzilla > nothing. That is, even though bugzilla is possibly my least favourite open source bug tracking system it's still better than continuing the way we are. We've been pretty lucky so far, in part due to Tom and others being remarkably diligent but it's only a matter of time until we forget or miss a critical report. And from a PR point of view it just looks terrible. So in short while I still think debbugs is the best approach to this I've seen at this point *any* free software based solution is fine with me. I'm assuming they can all be configured to send all new bug reports to a mailing list and I do think we should choose one that stores the database in Postgres, but I think that's true for nearly all of them and can be made true for all of them. -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
