On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 00:45 +0000, Greg Stark wrote: > On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > > Oh, wow, I didn't realize it was time for another round of this. Wheeeee! > > > > Actually I suspect it is time. > > My preferences have changed. While they used to go something like > debbugs > RT > nothing > bugzilla they now go something like debbugs > > RT > bugzilla > nothing. That is, even though bugzilla is possibly my > least favourite open source bug tracking system it's still better than > continuing the way we are. We've been pretty lucky so far, in part due > to Tom and others being remarkably diligent but it's only a matter of > time until we forget or miss a critical report. And from a PR point of > view it just looks terrible. > > So in short while I still think debbugs is the best approach to this > I've seen at this point *any* free software based solution is fine > with me.
I have been looking at roundup fairly extensively. It is what bugs.python.org uses. Joshua D. Drake -- PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564 Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering Respect is earned, not gained through arbitrary and repetitive use or Mr. or Sir. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
