Tom Lane wrote:
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <ste...@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes:
*sigh* - that was mostly ment as a joke and not a really serious
comment. However the idea I actually had with BZ back in the days was
not to use it as a full fledged tracker(in the sense of exposing it to
users or developers)
Instead I would just use it as the background engine that does nothing
more than being subscribed to -bugs, tracks the stuff there and provides
an summary export about (not)replied to reports. If somebody later on
wants to annotate the emails/reports there (as in solved,open,moved to
todo,not a pg core question,whatever) fine - if not fine as well :)
bugzilla doesn't really interface to email well enough to do that.
I gather that debbugs might work better, but I have no personal
experience with it.
well recent bugzilla versions do have both an email interface (an early
version of that was used in my prototype - the newer ones are much more
powerful an can do) and an remote XML-RPC Interface (which I used for
the bugform integration).
As a pure email tracker with no real external apps debbugs is probably
more powerful though (but not really used a lot outside of the debian
project).
Stefan
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
