Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > I like Andres' suggestion upthread of setting a deadline and > determining to bounce the patch if it's not committed by that date. > If it turns out we have to bounce it, that stinks, but I don't think > it makes sense to go to beta with a huge, barely-tested pile of code > in the tree. Not that the testing Heikki and Fujii Masao have been > doing until now hasn't been good, but it's not nearly as rigorous as > what we will get when all of our users start banging on it.
This argument would hold more water if there weren't *already* a huge, barely-tested pile of code in the tree, namely HS. If you think that's anywhere near ready to go to beta, I'm afraid I'd better disillusion you immediately. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers