"Greg Sabino Mullane" <g...@turnstep.com> writes: >> However, HS is already in the tree, and HS without SR is a whole lot >> less compelling than HS with SR. So it's going to be pretty >> unsatisfying if we can't get SR in there.
> I don't think that's the case. Having HS alone would be a huge win, > and the sooner we can get it out there the better. Those that are > waiting for SR might have to wait one more version, but my intuition > tells me that's a small minority compared to those waiting for HS. No, I don't think so. HS without SR means you still have to fool with setting up WAL-file-based replication, which despite the existence of pg_standby is a PITA. And you have to make a tradeoff of how often to flush WAL files to the standby. To be a real candidate for "it just works" replication, we've *got* to have SR. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers