"David E. Wheeler" <da...@kineticode.com> writes:
> On Jan 27, 2010, at 4:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Absolutely.  The difference here is in who is going to be expected to
>> try to deal with any problems.  When somebody says "if I do this in
>> plperlu, my database crashes!  Postgres sux!" it's not going to help to
>> say "that's a Perl bug", even if an independent observer might agree.
>> It's going to be *our* problem, and I don't see any reason to expect
>> a shred of help from the Perl side.

> Is that not the case with plperlu already?

Sure.  Which is why I'm resisting expanding our exposure to it.

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to