"David E. Wheeler" <da...@kineticode.com> writes: > On Jan 27, 2010, at 4:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Absolutely. The difference here is in who is going to be expected to >> try to deal with any problems. When somebody says "if I do this in >> plperlu, my database crashes! Postgres sux!" it's not going to help to >> say "that's a Perl bug", even if an independent observer might agree. >> It's going to be *our* problem, and I don't see any reason to expect >> a shred of help from the Perl side.
> Is that not the case with plperlu already? Sure. Which is why I'm resisting expanding our exposure to it. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers