"David E. Wheeler" <da...@kineticode.com> writes: > On Jan 27, 2010, at 4:15 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Sure. Which is why I'm resisting expanding our exposure to it
> I don't understand how it's expanding core's exposure to it. [ shrug...] I see little point in repeating myself yet again. It's obvious that the people who want this are entirely willing to adopt a Pollyanna-ishly optimistic view about its potential to cause serious problems that we may or may not be able to fix. I don't really expect to be able to prevent something along this line from getting committed --- I'm merely hoping to circumscribe it as much as possible and get large WARNING items into the manual's description. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers