On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 11:33 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > >> So what was the clear result? > > I have spoken clearly enough. You were welcome to attend the Hot Standby > User Group. The fact that you did not expresses your own priorities > quite well, ISTM. Your protestations to know more about the wishes of > users than they do themselves isn't hugely impressive.
This doesn't make any sense at all. It is not the case that people who attended the Hot Standby user group are the only ones who are entitled to provide any feedback, and that people who read pgsql-hackers are not (unless they also happen to have attended the Hot Standby user group). If anything, that's 100% backwards, but at any rate Heikki has probably spent more time over the last year on this feature than anyone in the world with the exception of yourself; I think that counts for a lot more than one two-hour meeting. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
