On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 07:01 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 11:33 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > > > >> So what was the clear result? > > > > I have spoken clearly enough. You were welcome to attend the Hot Standby > > User Group. The fact that you did not expresses your own priorities > > quite well, ISTM. Your protestations to know more about the wishes of > > users than they do themselves isn't hugely impressive. > > This doesn't make any sense at all.
I am busy working on the right features for the most number of people, as expressed to me. I accept there are people that disagree and I am sorry for that. Others are welcome to add code to do the things I will not be doing through lack of time, if they are not satisfied with my priority. I think we should extend the time available to make sure we have a sensible set of features for 9.0. The heat of this discussion tells me that we are going to be lacking features that are must-have to someone, whether or not they are in the majority. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers