Robert Haas escribió: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Alex Hunsaker <bada...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 08:49, Tim Bunce <tim.bu...@pobox.com> wrote: > >>> This is an update the fourth of the patches to be split out from the > >>> former 'plperl feature patch 1'. > >>> > >>> Changes in this patch: > >>> > >>> - Adds plperl.on_trusted_init and plperl.on_untrusted_init GUCs > >>> on_trusted_init is PGC_USERSET, on_untrusted_init is PGC_SUSET > >> > >> Im not a fan of the names (I think everyone gets trusted vs untrusted > >> confused). May I humbly suggest: > >> plperl.on_init > >> plperlu.on_init > >> plperl.both_on_init <- this one is the one that throws the scheme off :(
> > With all due respect.... yuck. > > OK, third time is the charm. Sigh. The "yuck" was in reference > specifically to the proposed GUC names. > > I like the original ones better. With all due respect, I think you should get more used to trimming the message you're replying to, so that your reply makes more sense to the readership at large. I fully realize that Gmail is not the best platform for that :-( -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
