On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > Robert Haas escribió: >> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Alex Hunsaker <bada...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 08:49, Tim Bunce <tim.bu...@pobox.com> wrote: >> >>> This is an update the fourth of the patches to be split out from the >> >>> former 'plperl feature patch 1'. >> >>> >> >>> Changes in this patch: >> >>> >> >>> - Adds plperl.on_trusted_init and plperl.on_untrusted_init GUCs >> >>> on_trusted_init is PGC_USERSET, on_untrusted_init is PGC_SUSET >> >> >> >> Im not a fan of the names (I think everyone gets trusted vs untrusted >> >> confused). May I humbly suggest: >> >> plperl.on_init >> >> plperlu.on_init >> >> plperl.both_on_init <- this one is the one that throws the scheme off :( > >> > With all due respect.... yuck. >> >> OK, third time is the charm. Sigh. The "yuck" was in reference >> specifically to the proposed GUC names. >> >> I like the original ones better. > > With all due respect, I think you should get more used to trimming the > message you're replying to, so that your reply makes more sense to the > readership at large. I fully realize that Gmail is not the best > platform for that :-(
Well, actually, I did that. Except I replied only to Alex. And then I hit send. Then I immediately realized my mistake, and did it over, trimming it wrong the second time. And then I hit send again. Actually, I find Gmail to be pretty good for this - it's just, I shouldn't try to answer my email when I'm exhausted and half-asleep. So... I'm going to bed now. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
