On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
2010/2/3 Teodor Sigaev <teo...@sigaev.ru>:
Can you rename RED and BLACK to RBRED and RBBLACK?
Yes, of course, done.
Any objections to commit?
I would like to see point #2 of the following email addressed before
commit. As things stand, it is not clear (at least to me) whether
this is a win.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-01/msg02552.php
Specifically, on this web page:
http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/wiki/2009-04-03
There is a section that begins with this line of text:
Repeat test with 100,000 identical records varying array length (len).
That test shows rbtree being a third slower than HEAD. But there's
not enough information on that web page to replicate that test, so
it's hard to speculate on what may be going wrong. I don't think we
should commit this until we understand that.
Robert, Mark described the test he did
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-01/msg02927.php
Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru),
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
Internet: o...@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
