2010/2/3 Oleg Bartunov <o...@sai.msu.su>: >>> I would like to see point #2 of the following email addressed before >>> commit. As things stand, it is not clear (at least to me) whether >>> this is a win. >>> >>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-01/msg02552.php >> >> Specifically, on this web page: >> >> http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/wiki/2009-04-03 >> >> There is a section that begins with this line of text: >> >> Repeat test with 100,000 identical records varying array length (len). >> >> That test shows rbtree being a third slower than HEAD. But there's >> not enough information on that web page to replicate that test, so >> it's hard to speculate on what may be going wrong. I don't think we >> should commit this until we understand that. > > Robert, Mark described the test he did > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-01/msg02927.php
So why did he get totally different answers than you? It's not enough to say "somebody else did a test and got better numbers than we did, so let's use theirs". ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
