On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > If this is turning into a vote: -1 from me for any work on this until > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.0_Open_Items is cleared. It > boggles my mind that anyone could have a different prioritization right now.
This isn't about priority, at least in my mind. It's about consensus. If we have consensus, the work can get done for 9.1. It seems like everyone is on the same page - that is a good thing. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
