On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: >> If adding new shared library is too big change at this point, I think >> that we should postpone the fix only for dblink to 9.1 or later. Since >> no one has complained about this long-term problem of dblink, I'm not >> sure it really should be fixed right now. Thought? > > +1. Let's fix walreceiver for now, and we can revisit dblink later. > Since we haven't had any complaints so far...
OK. I'll focus on walreceiver now. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
