On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 07:10 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > OK. In words of one syllable, your way still has all the same knobs, > plus some more.
I explained how the per-standby settings would take many parameters, whereas per-transaction settings take far fewer. > You sketched out a design which still had a per-standby setting for > each standby, but IN ADDITION had a setting for a setting to control > quorum commit[1]. No, you misread it. Again. The parameters were not IN ADDITION - obviously so, otherwise I wouldn't claim there were fewer, would I? Your reply has again avoided the subject of how we would handle failure modes with per-standby settings. That is important. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
