Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > One way to do that would be to refrain from flushing the commit > record to disk on the master until the standby has acknowledged > it. I'm not clear on the benefit of doing that, versus flushing the commit record and then waiting for responses. Either way some databases will commit before others -- what is the benefit of having the master lag? > Adding a synchronous standby should require some action in the > master, since it affects the behavior on master. +1 -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
