>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
Robert> I don't think so, either. The most someone might want to do Robert> is make ==> work wherever => does now, but I wouldn't want to Robert> start monkeying with that without some input from Andrew Robert> Gierth; and I don't think it's a stop-ship issue for 9.0. I'd really like to find a better operator name than ==>. But I'm not convinced one exists. While I don't like the inconsistency between ==> or whatever and the use of => in type input and output, I regard the text representation as being much harder to change safely, since client code will be parsing it. In this case the inconsistency seems like a much smaller problem than changing the text representation. -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad) -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
