On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 1:15 PM, David E. Wheeler <da...@kineticode.com> wrote: > On Jun 9, 2010, at 10:04 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > >>> I actually like :> pretty well. It looks more like =>, and has nice >>> correspondence to := for named function params. >> >> Colon was removed from the set of allowed operator-name characters years >> ago. There are conflicts with various usages (ecpg & psql variables). >> This is actually a place where the current := behavior could cause some >> issues, though I'm not aware of any at the moment. > > Oh, that's a shame. > > In that case, how about: > > 'foo' >> 'bar'
Well, that doesn't look much like an arrow, at least not to me... -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
