On Jun 9, 2010, at 10:04 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> I actually like :> pretty well. It looks more like =>, and has nice >> correspondence to := for named function params. > > Colon was removed from the set of allowed operator-name characters years > ago. There are conflicts with various usages (ecpg & psql variables). > This is actually a place where the current := behavior could cause some > issues, though I'm not aware of any at the moment.
Oh, that's a shame. In that case, how about: 'foo' >> 'bar' Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
