On ons, 2010-08-11 at 11:47 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: > > On ons, 2010-08-11 at 10:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> How about just this: > >> port = 0xC000 | (DEF_PGPORT & 0x3FFF); > > > The version number was put in there intentionally, for developers who > > work on multiple branches at once. That's the whole reason this code > > exists. Please don't remove it. > > I work on multiple branches all day every day. This wouldn't hinder > me in the slightest, because I use a different DEF_PGPORT for each > branch. If you don't, it's hard to see how you manage to deal with > multiple branches on one machine ... do you not ever actually install > them?
No, not nearly as much as I run "make check". > Even if you don't, changing this would only mean that you > couldn't safely run "make check" concurrently in multiple branches. That's exactly the point. The original discussion is here: http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/491d9935.9010...@gmx.net -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
