Josh Berkus wrote:
> All,
>
> I've been looking at the open item which belongs with this doc:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/backup-incremental-updated.html
>
> ... and my viewpoint is that the procedure described should be *cut*
> from the official docs and put on the Wiki, with warnings. It's simply
> far too hackish and dependant on DBA understanding of PostgreSQL
> internals to belong in the main docs.
>
> In 9.1 we'll probably have some machinery to make taking snapshots of
> the standby more reliable (like running pg_start_backup on the master),
> and then that procedure will belong in the main docs.
FYI, I am working on a doc update that will use pg_start/stop backup on
the master, as suggested by Fujii Masao:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-08/msg00237.php
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
