On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 13:44 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 8/24/10 12:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi> writes: > >> Is this method not reliable then? Can something go wrong even if the > >> user does exactly what the documentation says? > > > > It is not. This whole discussion started from somebody reporting that > > it didn't work. > > Again, given that this is a method which is (a) fairly minority-need, > and (b) not at all tested in the field, I do not think it belongs in the > main docs. Let's put it on the wiki and blog about it, and AFTER we've > collected bug reports and have something relatively bulletproof for 9.1, > THEN we put it in the main docs. > > We really shouldn't have anything in the main docs related to backup > which isn't 100% tested.
+1 JD -- PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579 Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
