On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 5:44 AM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > Again, given that this is a method which is (a) fairly minority-need, > and (b) not at all tested in the field, I do not think it belongs in the > main docs. Let's put it on the wiki and blog about it, and AFTER we've > collected bug reports and have something relatively bulletproof for 9.1, > THEN we put it in the main docs. > > We really shouldn't have anything in the main docs related to backup > which isn't 100% tested.
The procedure has been since 8.2. We should remove it from the documents since 8.2? Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
