On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > On fre, 2010-09-03 at 16:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Part of the reason it's sat on TODO is lack of consensus about how >> such a feature ought to look/work; particularly since most of the >> discussion about it has considered that it'd go along with stored >> procedures executing outside of transactions. > > I would probably be a mistake to tie these features together. They are > tricky enough separately.
Hm, do you think it would be possible to request manual transaction state when setting up the procedure (or reserve that ability for the future)? merlin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
