2010/9/28 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> writes: >> 2010/9/28 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: >>> But I guess you could get around that if you had to by putting the ARRAY >>> expression inside parens, and it would be a pretty darn unusual case >>> anyway. So this is probably the best choice. > >> I don't agree - There isn't reason for complicating proposed syntax. > > Yes, there is. The syntax you propose is flat out ambiguous: there are > two possible legal interpretations of some commands. That's not > acceptable, especially not when it's so easily fixed. >
what are you thinking? The subquery cannot be interpreted different. There are not possible use a isolated subquery as query. And subquery have to return one row, one column. Pavel > regards, tom lane > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
