Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> writes:
> 2010/9/28 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>> Yes, there is. Â The syntax you propose is flat out ambiguous: there are
>> two possible legal interpretations of some commands.
> what are you thinking? The subquery cannot be interpreted different.
Sure it can: it could be a parenthesized top-level query. In fact,
that's what plpgsql will assume if you feed it that syntax today.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
