Kevin Grittner wrote:
That went in an hour and a half before the CF deadline, but I just didn't feel right putting it into the CF in that shape.
Then keep on working on it and we can revisit its state when you're happy with it. The purpose of the CommitFest cut-off is not to block work on long-term development just because a deadline passed; it's to make sure patches which might otherwise never get a review are looked at eventually. Finding a reviewer for these larger and complicated patches is a very different sort of job than finding one for an average patch anyway.
I could use a brief reminder of how this bit fits into the "serializable lock consistency" patch that's already sitting into the CF queue as "Ready for Committer" though.
-- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US g...@2ndquadrant.com Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support www.2ndQuadrant.us -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
