On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Kevin Grittner <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: > Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >> I could use a brief reminder of how this bit fits into the >> "serializable lock consistency" patch that's already sitting into >> the CF queue as "Ready for Committer" though. > > [explanation]
The short version is that they are independent. The serializable lock consistency patch, I think, a very important one, although I am not entirely sure that I have the skill to do it justice. (I'm kinda hoping Tom will commit it, but If he doesn't have time I may have to take a crack at it.) -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
