Excerpts from Greg Smith's message of lun nov 15 12:32:25 -0300 2010: > I could use a brief reminder of how this bit fits into the "serializable > lock consistency" patch that's already sitting into the CF queue as > "Ready for Committer" though.
I remind you, though, that the most painful point that caused the commitfest process to come into existance was the HOT patch, which was very large and intrusive and didn't get any review until very late in the cycle. So getting some review earlier than at the last minute is important. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
