On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 01:33:39PM -0500, Greg Smith wrote: > Marko Tiikkaja wrote: > >This is almost exactly the patch from 2010-02 without > >CommandCounterIncrement()s. It's still a bit rough around the > >edges and needs some more comments, but I'm posting it here > >anyway. > > > >This patch passes all regression tests, but feel free to try to > >break it, there are probably ways to do that. This one also has > >the "always run DMLs to completion, and exactly once" behaviour. > > So this patch was marked "Ready for Committer", but a) no committer > has picked it up yet and b) Marko has made changes here that nobody > else has tested out yet that I've seen on the last. Accordingly, > that classification may have been optimistic. It seems to me that > another testing run-through from someone like David might be > appropriate to build some confidence this latest patch should be a > commit candidate. If there is a committer intending to work on this > as-is, they haven't identified themselves.
I've tested this one and not managed to break it. One thing it could use is support for EXPLAIN ANALYZE. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
