On tis, 2010-12-21 at 13:20 -0800, David Fetter wrote: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:14:31PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > On sön, 2010-11-14 at 04:45 +0200, Marko Tiikkaja wrote: > > > On 2010-11-12 8:25 PM +0200, I wrote: > > > > I'm going to take some time off this weekend to get a patch with this > > > > behaviour to the next commitfest. > > > > > > .. and a wild patch appears. > > > > > > This is almost exactly the patch from 2010-02 without > > > CommandCounterIncrement()s. It's still a bit rough around the edges and > > > needs some more comments, but I'm posting it here anyway. > > > > To pick up an earlier thread again, has any serious thought been given > > to adapting the SQL2001/DB2 syntax instead of our own? > > Yes, and it's a good deal more limited and less intuitive than ours.
Less intuitive, possibly, but how is it more limited? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
