On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Joel Jacobson <j...@gluefinance.com> wrote: > 2011/1/8 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>: >> I don't think your analysis is correct. Each entry in pg_depend >> represents the fact that one object depends on another object, and an >> object could easily depend on more than one other object, or be >> depended upon by more than one other object, or depend on one object >> and be depended on by another. > > What does that have to do with this?
Oops. I misread your query. I thought the duplicates were because you were feeding pg_describe_object the same classoid, objoid, objsubid pair more than once, but I see now that's not the case (UNION != UNION ALL). -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
