Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> So I don't want to give up the details of the function
>> or operator. But sticking them at the end after a colon might make it
>> clearer that the func/operator is referenced by the amproc or amop
>> entry, but is not the same thing.
> That seems like an improvement over the status quo, so do you want to
> go ahead and do that?
Are you voting to commit the patch I presented plus that change, or do
something different?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
