Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> So I guess I'm coming around to the idea that we want something not too >> much bigger than Andreas' original patch, but applying to both amop and >> amproc, and putting the operator/function description at the end.
> That's fine with me. OK, committed that way. > I think the principal argument for failing to > remove it entirely is that we've traditionally had it there, but IMHO > moving in the direction of treating them as separate objects is much > more clear and an altogether better approach. I think there's a usability argument in addition to just plain "we always did it that way". But anyway, this patch has now officially been discussed to death. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers