On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: >> I do not like the use of parentheses in the usage description "list >> (procedural) languages". Why not have it simply as "list procedural >> languages"? > > Because it lists non-procedural langauges as well? (I didn't check it, > that's just a guess)
There are many places in our code and documentation where "procedural language" or "language" are treated as synonyms. There's no semantic difference; procedural is simply a noise word. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
