On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 07:37 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Yeah. Procedural langauges may strictly be wrong, but people aren't > likely to misunderstand it.
That was idea when suggesting we call it "procedural languages". It is short and I do not think it can be misunderstood. Regards, Andreas -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
