On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote: > opinion isn't strong in this topic. One or twenty useless detoasting > isn't really significant in almost use cases (problem is thousands > detoasting).
Yeah. Many-times-repeated detoasting is really bad, and this is not the only place in the backend where we have this problem. :-( -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
