2011/1/19 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> opinion isn't strong in this topic. One or twenty useless detoasting >> isn't really significant in almost use cases (problem is thousands >> detoasting). > > Yeah. Many-times-repeated detoasting is really bad, and this is not > the only place in the backend where we have this problem. :-( >
??? some general solution can be pretty hardcore - some like handlers instead pointers on varlena :( I know mainly about plpgsql performance problems - but it is my interes. Plpgsql can be simply fixed - maybe 10 maybe less lines of code. Pavel > -- > Robert Haas > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
