On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > One idea that I think we discussed was to tie cache entries to the > memory context they were demanded in, and mark them unused at the next > context reset/delete. That way they'd be considered unused at the same > points where the current implementation would certainly have discarded > the value. This isn't perfect (because of pfree) but might be good > enough.
Yeah, I was thinking that's probably what would have to be done. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
