On Jan21, 2011, at 03:29 , Tom Lane wrote: > "Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> writes: >>> Robert Haas wrote: >>> Oh, you mean water that had some things you didn't want taken out >>> of it? > >> Right -- God only knows the number of things were filtered out to >> leave me with filtered water. What's "filtered" in this case is what >> was passed through, not what was removed. > > I think it's pretty common to use the phrase "filtered out" to identify > the stuff that gets removed by the filter, as opposed to what gets > through. So we could possibly use "Rows Filtered Out: nnn". I still > think that's more awkward than "Rows Removed: nnn" though.
"Rows Skipped: nnn", maybe? best regards, Florian Pflug -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
