2011/1/21 Florian Pflug <f...@phlo.org>: > On Jan21, 2011, at 03:29 , Tom Lane wrote: >> "Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> writes: >>>> Robert Haas wrote: >>>> Oh, you mean water that had some things you didn't want taken out >>>> of it? >> >>> Right -- God only knows the number of things were filtered out to >>> leave me with filtered water. What's "filtered" in this case is what >>> was passed through, not what was removed. >> >> I think it's pretty common to use the phrase "filtered out" to identify >> the stuff that gets removed by the filter, as opposed to what gets >> through. So we could possibly use "Rows Filtered Out: nnn". I still >> think that's more awkward than "Rows Removed: nnn" though. > > "Rows Skipped: nnn", maybe?
+1. Very straightforward to me. Regards, -- Hitoshi Harada -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
